Who records franchise failure rates?
Having spent a huge amount of time recently looking into Franchises, one question that always intrigues me is who records franchise failure rates?
One of the common myths about franchises is that they are a ‘proven business model’ and therefore have statistically higher succes rates.
After doing considerable research I would tend to disagree. There are many reasons why this is a myth and some of the main ones are:
- Most franchise businesses operate under a seperate legal entity i.e corporation, sole trader and trade as the franchise. If there is a failure then it is the legal entity that closes down. This just gets recorded, if at all, as a standard business failure.
- Unsuccesful franchises are generally financially tied into the contract for the term of the agreement i.e 5 years. If they wish to leave prior to that then they can be liable for the full fees they would have paid over the franchise terms. Many franchisees are happy to sign non disclosure agreements with the Franchise to just be released from their ongoing commitments and walk away.
- Mnay franchisees just get to the stage where they ‘close the doors’ and walk away and want no more part of it.
What I really want to know is what statistical evidence is there to prove that franchises have a higher success rate? In an industry that is strongly focused on threatening lawsuits for saying anything negative about a franchise who would ever get to know the truth?
Posted in: Franchise Myths | Email Post | Print Post
Help others find this article at:
del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Google Technorati Yahoo!










